Things or people (from now on, subjects) that are easy to read and relate to are awesome but subjects that are inscrutable are the type that tend to provoke fascination.
Opportunities to learn more about mysterious subjects are usually rare. Missing such an opportunity makes the desire to learn even more pointed.
Learning about things, stories, is satisfying and there are scholars that will devote their whole lives to analyzing a subject with pieces of information missing, trying to fill in the holes with their own analysis and ideas. It must be exciting, for example, to try to translate a work in an ancient language, using other languages and translations as tools to work through different pieces of a writing with the goal of eventually developing a full picture. I imagine such a translation comes along in big jumps with long periods of no progress.
Scientists trying to develop fossil records of a species, figuring out how it may have changed over its history and the forces that motivated the change, have some of the most interesting work I can imagine. This combines straightforward analysis of hard evidence with theory in a dynamic relationship. The scientist is forced to work on hunches and assumptions, knowing as they work that they may have to scrap months worth of work if some fact comes into the picture that debases one of their guesses.
In actually dealing with people, though, it's a really different pursuit.
When you want to learn more about someone, to know them better, you have to be patient. Opportunities to really talk to someone come and go. If you miss or squander an opportunity it can change the odds of you having an opportunity again in the future. This is less frustrating if you have only a casual interest in learning more about someone. But, if the person is really important to you and it is equally important that you get to know them better a missed opportunity can haunt you.
I'm not totally sure where I'm going with this. I spoke in my last post about challenges - I am thinking about the relationship between a challenge and a mystery. A challenge can be completely unambiguous and straightforward, just very difficult to rise to. A mystery leaves you guessing about how to act - you probably don't know how difficult the mystery will be to unravel ultimately or how close you are to doing so at any given time. Often times with challenges, you have a pretty good idea of how you are progressing in the task of overcoming them.
Being indecisive is more of a handicap in dealing with a mystery. If you are dealing with a challenge that requires an obvious course of action then there is only work to do, not so much decisions to make. Like I said before, solving a mystery involves a lot of guess work and assumptions, and if you are indecisive the trait will come out when you have to make a decision based on guesswork and assumptions.
I am thinking that mysteries are a subset of challenges. They are a type of challenge, in other words. For me, a mystery is the most difficult challenge of all. As you might be able to guess, a mystery is also my favorite kind of challenge.
It's all well and good to devote your life to an academic mystery. I think it's better to devote your life to making the mysterious people you know and care about less mysterious through patience, attention, and persistence.
People are much more than the sum of the things that they create or do. It's what drives people that I find most interesting, not what they are driven to. I think this is why I do a lot of the things that I do.
Next post: Superbowl Hijinks.
